In this episode, Patrick McKenzie (patio11) offers a reading of his viral essay, "The optimal amount of fraud is non-zero" with extensive live commentary. Patrick examines payment systems, benefits programs, and pandemic-era policies, to uncover how businesses and governments often intentionally accept some level of fraud as a cost of doing business. Reducing fraud to zero would require such restrictive verification that it would severely hamper legitimate commerce and social programs. Using examples from credit card processing to PPP loans, Patrick illustrates how different industries calibrate their tolerance for fraud based on their margins, mission, and societal role.
Support proven charities that deliver measurable results and learn how to maximize your charitable impact with GiveWell. First-time donors get $100 matched. Go to givewell.org (and type in "Complex Systems" at checkout).
Check is the leading payroll infrastructure provider and pioneer of embedded payroll. Check makes it easy for any SaaS platform to build a payroll business, and already powers 60+ popular platforms. Head to checkhq.com/complex and tell them patio11 sent you.
- Timestamps: (00:00) Intro (00:32) Origins of the essay and Dan Davies' influence (02:16) Fraud is a policy choice (04:56) The unique nature of fraud enforcement (07:54) Who pays for payment fraud? (12:55) Fraud as a necessary business expense (21:13) Sponsors: GiveWell & Check (27:43) Credit reports (29:19) Anti fraud loops used in online commerce (35:38) Different business tolerances for fraud (37:20) High vs low margin fraud strategies (41:40) Fraud in Benefit Systems and Pandemic Programs (43:29) Taxes (45:38) Fraud as an intended component (51:55) Wrap
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Patrick McKenzie. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Patrick McKenzie och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
