In this episode of New Ideal Live, Onkar Ghate and Adi Dynar discuss the Supreme Court's overturning of its 1984 Chevron doctrine, which held that courts should sometimes defer to a federal agency’s interpretation of a vague law.
Among the topics covered:
* How Chevron gave the executive branch the power to make law, thereby incentivizing the passing of vague laws;
* How Chevron made it harder for individuals to challenge regulations;
* The majority opinion’s insufficient stress on the issue of the separation of powers;
* Why the argument that courts lack factual expertise is a smokescreen;
* How the practice of deference relies on a presumption in favor of government power;
* The Court's failure to articulate the principle of the rule of law;
* Why it is unlikely that this decision will cause legal chaos.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Ayn Rand Institute. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Ayn Rand Institute och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.