“If God is real, where’s the evidence?” This is one objection that I hear a lot as a Christian apologist. And on the surface, it seems like a totally fair question. After all, we live in a scientific age, a rational age (at least, supposedly), and we have come to expect a certain standard of evidential accountability from those who make truth claims. And certainly, the existence of God is a truth claim.
However, what if the question of God’s existence is not something that can be answered using evidence, but rather is a a prerequisite for even believing that evidence is meaningful at all? In other words, what if atheists, skeptics and unbelievers have the issue completely backwards?
That’s what Joel Settecase and Sye Ten Bruggencate discuss in this first-ever episode of “Answer Anyone with Sye Ten Bruggencate.”
Specifically, you’ll find out…
What apologetics is.
What evidence is.
Why the very use of evidence presupposes God’s existence.
How a presuppositional approach to apologetics can answer the question of God’s existence best, and why Joel and Sye don’t typically use that phrase.
How Joel first started using Sye’s material back in the day, and what was the response of his youth group students.
Much, much more. This episode is packed!
Support this show! https://patreon.com/answeranyone
Get the full show notes at https://thethink.institute/podcast
---
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/worldviewlegacy/message
