Euclid’s Elements, read backwards, reduces complex truths to simpler ones, such as the Pythagorean Theorem to the parallelogram area theorem, and that in turn to triangle congruence. How far can this reductive process be taken, and what should be its ultimate goals? Some have advocated that the axiomatic-deductive program in mathematics is best seen in purely logical terms, but this perspective leaves some fundamental challenges unresolved.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Intellectual Mathematics. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Intellectual Mathematics och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
