Yoel and Mickey discuss a new paper by Tal Yarkoni suggesting that quantitative research in psychology is suffering from a generaliozability crisis. Do the numbers and statistics that psychological scientists present in their papers correspond to their verbal claims? What would psychological science look like if psychologists made fewer general statements? Should psychologists conduct more qualitative and descriptive research? Did Tal Yarkoni himself use a quantitative argument to prop up very old verbal claims about the problem of induction?
Bonus: Before discussing generalizability, Yoel and Mickey discuss Contrapoints and her new video on cancel-culture.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett. Innehållet i podden är skapat av Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett och inte av, eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
